It’s another record-breaking year for TV news, at least according to a recent survey from the Radio Television Digital News Association. Regrettably, the real story is a lot less exciting— and it raises a lot more questions.
OnThursday, the Federal Communications
Commission proposed rules that would further weaken media ownership
limits for local newspapers and broadcast stations. The
agency's proposal is strikingly
similar to one adopted in 2007 under former FCC Chairman Kevin
Martin. Those rules were met with overwhelming public opposition from
across the country, as well as from bipartisan leaders in Congress, and
were thrown out by a federal appeals court last summer.
At today’s FCC hearing on
the Information Needs of Communities, Free Press Policy Counsel Corie Wright made
the case for why we need a new era of broadcaster transparency. Through a few
simple changes, Wright argues, the FCC could make available vital information
about how the media serve local communities — and enable citizens, journalists
and public interest groups to hold media accountable.
The text of Corie Wright’s
speech, delivered at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass
Communications at Arizona State University, follows below.
Question:Two federal agencies review the same merger. Both agencies have jurisdiction to review the merger under U.S. law. The agencies review the merger during the same time period, and ultimately they reach the same decision – to approve the merger with conditions. One is right, the other is wrong. Why?
Recently, the National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC), a non-profit organization with a long and respected history of civil rights advocacy, submitted a joint filing with 30 other organizations, including Free Press, calling for an FCC inquiry into the prevalence of hate speech in the media.